7/24/2023 0 Comments Ace of spades hq official![]() Due to the pistol being cut during development, he was given the more powerful Prototype Rifle, although he still wears his shoulder holster in game. Given Song's original image, in the beta he may have used a pistol in the final mission.The longer you wait, the closer the world comes to nuclear Armageddon." Trivia I'm not going to warn you about him, you've read the files. I know you've been champing at the bit to get to Song. He knows he owes you a lot, and he presumes you're going to take it. He wanted to personally extend the offer for the Song's contract to us before he put it up for bid. "Congratulations! I just got word from Colonel Garrett. Subject: General Choi Song, the Ace of Spades He must be stopped at all costs." E-mail message Intelligent, ruthless, and highly disciplined, he killed his father, the President, to prevent North Korea from capitulating to Western pressures and currently holds the codes for his county's considerable nuclear stockpile. The AN and ExOps invaded the missile base to stop a massive nuclear strike, freed President Kim, and either captured or killed Song.ĮxOps bio Name: Choi Song "General Song is the most dangerous man on earth. It soon appeared that Choi Kim was, in fact, alive, and was held hostage in Song's nuclear missile base. A massive bounty of $100,000,000 was put on his head, leading ExOps to deploy their mercenaries to North Korea. ![]() Replacing his father's government with a dictatorship, Choi Song cut all connections to North Korea, and also set up a massive nuclear program and secretly sent a shipment of nuclear weapons to known terrorist elements, which were intercepted by an Australian tanker.Īfter the Allied Nations declared war on North Korea, Song and his top officials were given card titles in the Deck of 52, with Song declared the "Ace of Spades". George Floyd weighed 230 pounds.Song staged a coup against his father's government, North Korea under Choi Kim, and supposedly shot his father. ![]() Cops are supposed to continue restraining the suspects, for the cops' protection, as well as for the suspect's own protection (so they don't self injure).ĭerek Chauvin weighs 140 pounds. The testimony from all the cop experts (including the state's) was that cops are trained to continue to restrain suspects under the influence of drugs even after they lose consciousness, because such suspects can regain consciousness suddenly, and when they do, they can become violent. ![]() He was struggling and talking the first several minutes, and unconscious for the last three. The 9-1/2 minutes was how long Floyd was restrained on the ground. The state's own ME testified that Floyd died from a combination of factors, including his badly diseased heart, the illegal drugs, and the exertion of struggling with the cops. That was not disputed.įloyd also swallowed a bunch of speedballs as the cops showed up. Because it is often important that reforms make just the changes we wanted, and no others—and they shouldn't be hijacked down-the-road by people saying that what they want is the only consistent action toward what we originally wanted.Ģ95 272 Took five good size cops to subdue someone with severe heart disease? And it took 9+ minutes? _įloyd had 90% and 75% proximal occlusion in his major heart arteries, and he had extremely high blood pressure (untreated). It might just be the case that political argument is enough removed from simple fact-based argument, that context by which Slippery Slope applies as a "fallacy", simply does not apply. And one thing you cannot prove simply by waving the "Slippery Slope" flag is that a proposition only applies here and has no further implications.Įspecially not when they are saying that the actions taken on race and ethnicity demand a proposed equality of action to something they did not use to apply to. Liberals often use the Disproof-by-Fallacy fallacy, which is because your argument proposes a slippery slope, you cannot be right.Ī political proposition (or prescription) already weakens the argument against slippery slope, since in a like form as to how Slippery Slope is a fallacy, you cannot prove that an action will follow a proposition either.īut political advocacy is not about whether or not action follows proposition-it is the urging of action according argument proposed, it is already one-step into the future, one step into what Man, by-and-large is not doing. In other words, where the conservatives turned out to be right about the common ground, in reality, we can't tell them they were right, because that will mean they'll want to argue that they are right on things we're not granting them. They argue about even admitting when conservatives are right "encourages" the "right wing".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |